<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementMultifactor World &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/category/multifactor-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What to Make of 10-Year Small-Cap and Value Results</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/01/25/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/01/25/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=2539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ken French’s recently updated global factor data shows the global size and value premiums were basically flat for the past 10 years (the value premium was actually about –1 percent per year over this span). This long-term historical result has surprised many people and naturally led some to ask whether these premiums can be expected...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/01/25/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/">What to Make of 10-Year Small-Cap and Value Results</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken French’s recently updated global factor data shows the global size and value premiums were basically flat for the past 10 years (the value premium was actually about –1 percent per year over this span). This long-term historical result has surprised many people and naturally led some to ask whether these premiums can be expected in the future. Figure 1 graphs the one-, three-, five-, 10-, 15- and 20-year average size and value premiums using the global data set.</p>
<p>Over the full annual history of the size and value data in the U.S., the size premium has averaged 3.4 percent per year with 14 percent volatility, while the value premium has averaged 5.0 percent per year with 14.1 percent volatility. These equate to Sharpe Ratios of 0.24 and 0.36, respectively. This also means that it can be expected for these premiums to be flat in (very) roughly 20 percent of 10-year periods (or, more precisely, in about 20 percent of 10-year periods for the size premium and 15 percent for the value premium). While 10-year periods such as 2006–2015 shouldn’t happen frequently, one 10-year stretch like this within an investment lifetime is well within the realm of possibility. And it’s important to emphasize that periods like these don’t prove the premiums have disappeared precisely because they are well within the realm of possibility.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://multifactorworld.com/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/01/25/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/">What to Make of 10-Year Small-Cap and Value Results</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/01/25/what-to-make-of-10-year-small-cap-and-value-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Are You Paying for Your Size and Value Tilt?</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/27/much-paying-size-value-tilt/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/27/much-paying-size-value-tilt/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s becoming clear that the price for overall U.S. equity market exposure is close to zero. Many market-cap weighted index funds and exchange-traded funds from Vanguard and others are charging expense ratios of five basis points (bps) or less. An interesting, and more difficult, question to answer: How much are you paying to gain exposure...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/27/much-paying-size-value-tilt/">How Much Are You Paying for Your Size and Value Tilt?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s becoming clear that the price for overall U.S. equity market exposure is close to zero. Many market-cap weighted index funds and exchange-traded funds from Vanguard and others are charging expense ratios of five basis points (bps) or less. An interesting, and more difficult, question to answer: How much are you paying to gain exposure to small-cap and value stocks across the funds in the marketplace? This is more difficult to answer because a fund that calls itself “small cap” may own stocks that are materially smaller than another fund that also has “small cap” in its title. The same is true for funds with the word “value” in their names.</p>
<p>I explore one methodology here by running Fama-French three-factor regressions for a large number of Vanguard and DFA funds and using the output to tease out how much additional expense ratio investors are paying on average for small-cap and value exposure, respectively. (Anyone who is interested in the exact methodology can email me. The details are too laborious to include in the blog post.)</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=154" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/27/much-paying-size-value-tilt/">How Much Are You Paying for Your Size and Value Tilt?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/27/much-paying-size-value-tilt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months, the difference in historical performance between DFA Small Value (ticker: DFSVX) and Vanguard Small Value (VISVX) has narrowed. For example, for the 10-year period ending December 2014, the compound annual return of DFSVX was 7.9 percent while VISVX earned 8.3 percent. Comparatively, for the 10-year period ending December 2012, compound...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/">Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months, the difference in historical performance between DFA Small Value (ticker: DFSVX) and Vanguard Small Value (VISVX) has narrowed. For example, for the 10-year period ending December 2014, the compound annual return of DFSVX was 7.9 percent while VISVX earned 8.3 percent. Comparatively, for the 10-year period ending December 2012, compound annual returns were 11.3 percent for DFSVX and 9.6 percent for VISVX. What explains this reversal?</p>
<p><strong>Examining the Early Period</strong></p>
<p>From January 2003 through December 2012, a factor analysis shows the two funds had roughly comparable exposure to value, but DFSVX had markedly higher exposure to market risk (i.e., beta risk) and owned much smaller companies. Since both the equity market and small-cap stocks did exceedingly well during this period, with an average annual equity premium of 8.0 percent and a size premium of 4.3 percent, it’s not surprising to see that DFA Small Value had substantially higher performance than Vanguard Small Value.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=153" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/">Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deflation and Stock and Bond Returns</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/02/23/deflation-stock-bond-returns/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/02/23/deflation-stock-bond-returns/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Overview: With expected inflation rates very low, there will be significant attention on the possibility of deflation causing the stock market to fall. This blog examines the relationship between the rate of inflation and stock and bond returns. Generally, the research shows that stock returns are no lower in deflationary environments than in normal inflationary...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/02/23/deflation-stock-bond-returns/">Deflation and Stock and Bond Returns</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overview:</strong> With expected inflation rates very low, there will be significant attention on the possibility of deflation causing the stock market to fall. This blog examines the relationship between the rate of inflation and stock and bond returns. Generally, the research shows that stock returns are no lower in deflationary environments than in normal inflationary ones. The research does find, though, that both stocks and bonds have done poorly in high-inflation environments.</p>
<p>Expected inflation rates in the U.S. and elsewhere are very low. Figure 1 shows the average annual expected inflation rates in the U.S. over the next one, three, five, 10, 20 and 30 years.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=152" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/02/23/deflation-stock-bond-returns/">Deflation and Stock and Bond Returns</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/02/23/deflation-stock-bond-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional Thoughts on the Rising Glidepath Approach</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/10/13/additional-thoughts-on-the-rising-glidepath-approach/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/10/13/additional-thoughts-on-the-rising-glidepath-approach/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Watch the video on Multifactor World.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/10/13/additional-thoughts-on-the-rising-glidepath-approach/">Additional Thoughts on the Rising Glidepath Approach</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the video on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=151" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/10/13/additional-thoughts-on-the-rising-glidepath-approach/">Additional Thoughts on the Rising Glidepath Approach</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/10/13/additional-thoughts-on-the-rising-glidepath-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analytical Evaluation of Rising Glidepath Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/29/an-analytical-evaluation-of-rising-glidepath-claims/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/29/an-analytical-evaluation-of-rising-glidepath-claims/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, a piece by Michael Kitces and Wade Pfau made the claim that mechanically increasing the equity allocation during retirement — which they term a “rising glidepath” — could reduce the likelihood that a retiree outlives his or her assets and could decrease the magnitude of shortfall when capital market returns disappoint. Specifically, the...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/29/an-analytical-evaluation-of-rising-glidepath-claims/">An Analytical Evaluation of Rising Glidepath Claims</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, a piece by Michael Kitces and Wade Pfau made the claim that mechanically increasing the equity allocation during retirement — which they term a “rising glidepath” — could reduce the likelihood that a retiree outlives his or her assets and could decrease the magnitude of shortfall when capital market returns disappoint. Specifically, the paper stated:</p>
<p>“We find, surprisingly, that rising equity glidepaths in retirement … have the potential to actually reduce both the probability of failure and the magnitude of failure for client portfolios.”</p>
<p>I initially suspected the basic claims might not hold up under analytic scrutiny and recently got the chance to dig into their data tables to find out. In my analysis, I focus on the success rates and 5th percentile shortfall results they report in Tables 2, 4 and 6 in their paper. These three tables contain results for 4 percent withdrawal rates under three different sets of capital market assumptions.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=148" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/29/an-analytical-evaluation-of-rising-glidepath-claims/">An Analytical Evaluation of Rising Glidepath Claims</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/29/an-analytical-evaluation-of-rising-glidepath-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resurrecting the Size Premium</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/25/resurrecting-the-size-premium/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/25/resurrecting-the-size-premium/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There have been a number of articles over the past few years claiming to refute the existence of a small-cap (or size) premium, which is the historical difference in returns between small-cap stocks and large-cap stocks. While the critiques have been somewhat varied, two common claims are that the risk-adjusted returns of small-cap stocks have...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/25/resurrecting-the-size-premium/">Resurrecting the Size Premium</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been a number of articles over the past few years claiming to refute the existence of a small-cap (or size) premium, which is the historical difference in returns between small-cap stocks and large-cap stocks. While the critiques have been somewhat varied, two common claims are that the risk-adjusted returns of small-cap stocks have been similar to large-cap stocks and that the performance of small-cap stocks has been weak in international stock markets.</p>
<p><strong>The Size Premium in Growth and Value Stocks</strong></p>
<p>While it’s true in aggregate that small-cap stocks have had similar risk-adjusted returns (or Sharpe Ratios) compared with large-cap stocks, a more nuanced picture emerges when we separately look at the performance of small-cap versus large-cap in growth stocks and then in value stocks. The figure below displays the difference in Sharpe Ratios comparing small-cap growth stocks with large-cap growth stocks and then comparing small-cap value stocks with large-cap value stocks.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=147" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/25/resurrecting-the-size-premium/">Resurrecting the Size Premium</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/25/resurrecting-the-size-premium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Some Bond Fund Prices Stale?</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/18/are-some-bond-fund-prices-stale/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/18/are-some-bond-fund-prices-stale/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have long been skeptical of how fair bond fund prices are — or more accurately said, the potential ability for knowledgeable investors to “game” bond fund prices — in fixed income asset classes where liquidity isn’t great. Two asset classes that immediately come to mind are municipal bonds and high-yield corporate bonds. I finally...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/18/are-some-bond-fund-prices-stale/">Are Some Bond Fund Prices Stale?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long been skeptical of how fair bond fund prices are — or more accurately said, the potential ability for knowledgeable investors to “game” bond fund prices — in fixed income asset classes where liquidity isn’t great. Two asset classes that immediately come to mind are municipal bonds and high-yield corporate bonds. I finally got around to testing this proposition using daily returns data for a handful of different bond funds in these two asset classes. The findings confirm my suspicion.</p>
<p>If bond fund prices (or, equivalently, net asset values) were fair on a day-to-day basis, you should generally see that a prior day’s return for a fund tells you nothing about what today’s return will be. In other words, past returns shouldn’t predict future returns. The good news is that this is a testable proposition.</p>
<p>I pulled daily returns data for five different large bond funds from two different fund families. The first three funds have the majority of their portfolios invested in less liquid securities like municipal bonds and high-yield corporate bonds. The last two tend to own fixed income securities with better trading liquidity.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=146" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/18/are-some-bond-fund-prices-stale/">Are Some Bond Fund Prices Stale?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/08/18/are-some-bond-fund-prices-stale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Against Inflation: Evaluating Inflation Hedge Misconceptions and Strategies</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/06/09/protecting-against-inflation-evaluating-inflation-hedge-misconceptions-and-strategies-2/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/06/09/protecting-against-inflation-evaluating-inflation-hedge-misconceptions-and-strategies-2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The financial media are full of conjecture about which strategies might effectively hedge inflation risk or not. Here we explore which asset classes, if any, have been effective at protecting against inflation risk. First, it is helpful to address some common logical and analytical misconceptions about hedging inflation risk. Focus on Correlation, Not Volatility When...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/06/09/protecting-against-inflation-evaluating-inflation-hedge-misconceptions-and-strategies-2/">Protecting Against Inflation: Evaluating Inflation Hedge Misconceptions and Strategies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small">The financial media are full of conjecture about which strategies might effectively hedge inflation risk or not. Here we explore which asset classes, if any, have been effective at protecting against inflation risk. First, it is helpful to address some common logical and analytical misconceptions about hedging inflation risk.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><strong>Focus on Correlation, Not Volatility</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">When evaluating whether an asset class effectively protects against inflation, the focus should be on the correlation between that asset class’s returns and inflation and not the relative volatility of the asset class’s returns when compared with the volatility of inflation. This misconception often leads to assumptions, such as commodities as an asset class cannot effectively hedge inflation because its returns are about 8–10 times more volatile than inflation. This is simply false.</span></p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=145" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/06/09/protecting-against-inflation-evaluating-inflation-hedge-misconceptions-and-strategies-2/">Protecting Against Inflation: Evaluating Inflation Hedge Misconceptions and Strategies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/06/09/protecting-against-inflation-evaluating-inflation-hedge-misconceptions-and-strategies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective on High-Frequency Trading</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/04/14/perspective-on-high-frequency-trading/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/04/14/perspective-on-high-frequency-trading/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have received a number of questions since “60 Minutes” ran a piece on high-frequency trading (HFT)on March 30 (lest we forget, this is the same “60 Minutes” that ran a piece in 2010 that predicted the municipal market would implode in 2011, and we all know how that turned out). I’ll summarize what I think...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/04/14/perspective-on-high-frequency-trading/">Perspective on High-Frequency Trading</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small">I have received a number of questions since <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/60-minutes-investigates-high-frequency-trading/" target="_blank">“60 Minutes” ran a piece on high-frequency trading (HFT)</a>on March 30 (lest we forget, this is the same “60 Minutes” that ran a piece in 2010 that predicted the municipal market would implode in 2011, and we all know how that turned out). I’ll summarize what I think we know about HFT at this point, a viewpoint that runs counter to the perspective offered on “60 Minutes.”</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">What Is HFT?</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Larry Harris, professor of finance at the University of Southern California, has spent an academic career studying trading in equity markets, and <a href="http://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2013/04/24/what-to-do-about-high-frequency-trading/" target="_blank">he categorizes high-frequency traders</a> into three areas:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">1) Market makers<br />
2) Fundamentally driven traders<br />
3) Front-runners</span></p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=144" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/04/14/perspective-on-high-frequency-trading/">Perspective on High-Frequency Trading</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/04/14/perspective-on-high-frequency-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
