<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementNew Factors That May Not Be &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Factors That May Not Be</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=3022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Portfolio-based risk factors are identified through diversified, zero-cost, long/short portfolios that may link stock returns to systematic risk. There is a substantial amount of evidence in the academic literature that some portfolio-based risk factors explain well the cross section of stock returns. Using a size factor and value factor in addition to the market factor,...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/">New Factors That May Not Be</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portfolio-based risk factors are identified through diversified, zero-cost, long/short portfolios that may link stock returns to systematic risk. There is a substantial amount of evidence in the academic literature that some portfolio-based risk factors explain well the cross section of stock returns.</p>
<p>Using a size factor and value factor in addition to the market factor, in 1993, Eugene Fama and Kenneth French introduced their three-factor model, which explained stock returns better than the traditional one-factor CAPM model. This seminal asset pricing model ushered in an era that has seen many risk factors (such as momentum) introduced in the literature. But not all proposed risk factors hold up under scrutiny, nor do they all come with a clear risk/return explanation.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-new-factors-may-not-be" target="_blank">ETF.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/">New Factors That May Not Be</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/08/01/new-factors-that-may-not-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
