<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementNo Big Edge For More-Active Funds &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>No Big Edge For More-Active Funds</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 09:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=2776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The prevailing wisdom is that the market for equities in emerging markets is less efficient than in developed markets. Unfortunately, the evidence doesn’t support this hypothesis. For instance, the S&#38;P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) scorecard showed that over the 10-year period ending June 2015, 92% of actively managed emerging market funds underperformed their benchmark, the...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/">No Big Edge For More-Active Funds</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prevailing wisdom is that the market for equities in emerging markets is less efficient than in developed markets. Unfortunately, the evidence doesn’t support this hypothesis. For instance, the S&amp;P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) scorecard showed that over the 10-year period ending June 2015, 92% of actively managed emerging market funds underperformed their benchmark, the S&amp;P/IFCI Composite Index.</p>
<p>On an equal-weighted basis, the full universe of actively managed funds returned 7.2% over that period and underperformed the benchmark by 1.9 percentage points. On an asset-weighted basis, the underperformance was 1.2 percentage points.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-no-big-edge-more-active-funds?nopaging=1" target="_blank">ETF.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/">No Big Edge For More-Active Funds</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2016/05/09/no-big-edge-for-more-active-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
