<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementThe Hidden Provision in the Department of Labor’s Proposed Fiduciary Rule &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Hidden Provision in the Department of Labor’s Proposed Fiduciary Rule</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;best interest contract exemption&#8221; has profound ramifications for retirement plan participants. In its proposed rule requiring that all advisors to retirement plans act as &#8220;fiduciaries,&#8221; the U.S. Department of Labor includes a &#8220;best interest contract exemption.&#8221; In my view, this exemption is as significant – if not more so – than the proposed rule...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/">The Hidden Provision in the Department of Labor’s Proposed Fiduciary Rule</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The &#8220;best interest contract exemption&#8221; has profound ramifications for retirement plan participants.</strong></p>
<p>In its proposed rule requiring that all advisors to retirement plans act as &#8220;fiduciaries,&#8221; the U.S. Department of Labor includes a &#8220;best interest contract exemption.&#8221; In my view, this exemption is as significant – if not more so – than the proposed rule itself.</p>
<p>Background of the fiduciary rule. Few retirement plan participants are aware their trusted advisors may not be &#8220;fiduciaries.&#8221; The securities industry has done a brilliant job of obfuscating the difference between the fiduciary standard, which carries a legal obligation to act in the best interest of the client, and the much lower &#8220;suitability&#8221; standard, which brokers and insurance agents owe to plan participants.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article at <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-smarter-mutual-fund-investor/2015/05/08/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule" target="_blank">US News</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/">The Hidden Provision in the Department of Labor’s Proposed Fiduciary Rule</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/06/01/the-hidden-provision-in-the-department-of-labors-proposed-fiduciary-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
