<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementComparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multifactor World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months, the difference in historical performance between DFA Small Value (ticker: DFSVX) and Vanguard Small Value (VISVX) has narrowed. For example, for the 10-year period ending December 2014, the compound annual return of DFSVX was 7.9 percent while VISVX earned 8.3 percent. Comparatively, for the 10-year period ending December 2012, compound...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/">Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months, the difference in historical performance between DFA Small Value (ticker: DFSVX) and Vanguard Small Value (VISVX) has narrowed. For example, for the 10-year period ending December 2014, the compound annual return of DFSVX was 7.9 percent while VISVX earned 8.3 percent. Comparatively, for the 10-year period ending December 2012, compound annual returns were 11.3 percent for DFSVX and 9.6 percent for VISVX. What explains this reversal?</p>
<p><strong>Examining the Early Period</strong></p>
<p>From January 2003 through December 2012, a factor analysis shows the two funds had roughly comparable exposure to value, but DFSVX had markedly higher exposure to market risk (i.e., beta risk) and owned much smaller companies. Since both the equity market and small-cap stocks did exceedingly well during this period, with an average annual equity premium of 8.0 percent and a size premium of 4.3 percent, it’s not surprising to see that DFA Small Value had substantially higher performance than Vanguard Small Value.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.multifactorworld.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=153" target="_blank">Multifactor World</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/">Comparing DFA Small Value to Vanguard Small Value</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2015/04/20/comparing-dfa-small-value-vanguard-small-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
