<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JMF Capstone Wealth ManagementLook Before A Low Vol Leap &#8211; JMF Capstone Wealth Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com</link>
	<description>An Alabama registered investment advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Look Before A Low Vol Leap</title>
		<link>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/</link>
		<comments>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A number of academic papers have demonstrated within the last few years that low-volatility stocks have provided greater returns than higher-volatility stocks. As I’ve mentioned before, these findings run counter to economic theory, which predicts that higher expected risk is compensated with a higher expected return. The result is what’s known as the low-volatility anomaly....</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/">Look Before A Low Vol Leap</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of academic papers have demonstrated within the last few years that low-volatility stocks have provided greater returns than higher-volatility stocks. As I’ve mentioned before, these findings run counter to economic theory, which predicts that higher expected risk is compensated with a higher expected return. The result is what’s known as the low-volatility anomaly.</p>
<p>A pair of papers recently examined two different aspects of this anomaly. Xi Li, Rodney Sullivan and Luis Garcia-Feijóo, the authors of the 2013 study, “The Limits to Arbitrage and the Low-Volatility Anomaly,” explored whether the abnormal returns associated with the low-volatility anomaly can be effectively captured, or whether the returns are actually subsumed by some limits to investors effectively arbitraging them away.</p>
<p>To accomplish their objective, the authors examined the role of portfolio rebalancing and transaction costs in an investor’s attempt to extract profits from the low-risk anomaly. The study, which appeared in the January/February 2014 issue of Financial Analysts Journal, covered the period from July 1963 through December 2010. The following is a summary of the authors’ findings:</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/23201-swedroe-look-before-a-low-vol-leap.html" target="_blank">ETF.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/">Look Before A Low Vol Leap</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jmfcapstone.com">JMF Capstone Wealth Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jmfcapstone.com/2014/09/22/look-before-a-low-vol-leap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
